The churchians who have sat quietly in their pews as the pulpit was taken by priestesses and trannies, who have looked the other way as the land was plundered and their children's minds and bodies poisoned, who have sublimated their patriotism into slavish devotion to Israel, are not true Christians at all. And indeed, there will be no help coming from the churches.
On one hand, if my work is upsetting to women, this is a positive signal my art is an effective rebellion against the Feminine Tyranny of the Sexual Dystopia we live in.
I don't think you understand my art — which is okay, not trying to be rude to you.
I don't ever like to explain the illusion, the performance, the theatricality of the magic trick that is Billionaire Psycho, because this ruins the show.
I hesitate to explain the aesthetic design principles beneath Edison Blake, to reveal the man behind the curtain.
Billionaire Psycho is a mask I write through — a nihilistic mirror image of the world we live in. His sins reflect the sins of this world. Edison Blake is a sympathetic portrayal of a villain... obviously, he's a monster, but no less monstrous than the world you and I already live in.
You are projecting female values onto a male experience.
Sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive.
The lives of women are inherently more valuable than the lives of men.
The short answer is that Edison Blake, Billionaire Psycho is the embodiment of a convergence of various disciplines (economics, psychology, and game theory).
His nihilism reflects the Social Decay we live in.
Today Western Civilization is trapped in a downward cycle, cannibalizing itself. Promiscuity has short-term benefits, long-term negative externalities.
The strategy of a playboy, womanizer reflects a ruthless approach to negative-sum economics.
In game theory, this is referred to as Defect-Defect equilibrium (choosing between Cooperate-Defect). A playboy prioritizes his sexual adventures over the damage he does to women, their future husbands, and his overall community.
But the bigger question is, why should anyone be honorable in a dishonorable world?
I'm sure you will disagree, you expect men to sacrifice for women and protect, provide for them no matter what.
After a long paragraph, you write a short paragraph that's only one sentence.
Then you switch between long, short, long, short.
This allows the reader's eyes to rest, by providing negative space.
Obviously, there's more complexity than that, but if you stick to these simple rules, your layout will immediately be in the top 15% of writers. It surprises me how many professionals miss the basic lessons on layout.
In comparison with your early comment (which, I appreciate any feedback, good or bad), which was a 25-line wall of text. The problem with this is that if you examine eye tracking software and cameras, you will discover that the human eye doesn't move in an exact linear pattern. The human eye darts around erratically, which is the foundation of all visual design.
So, somewhere around the 4th or 5th line, my eye (and everyone else's) gets lost.
I solve this by zooming in extremely close and then scrolling down the page, but it's just an inefficient style of presentation.
Indentation provides a reliable solution, fortunately.
Thanks, I have been training new writers along FrogTwitter for the past 2 months.
Hard for me to articulate to beginners how to change, improve, polish until I look at their work, and start writing it down and diagramming it.
Later this year I will publish a list on basic rules to follow, key patterns simplified to improve prose, but right now I'm still trying to figure out what problems most autodidact writers have.
Can't offer solutions until I know the main concerns.
The churchians who have sat quietly in their pews as the pulpit was taken by priestesses and trannies, who have looked the other way as the land was plundered and their children's minds and bodies poisoned, who have sublimated their patriotism into slavish devotion to Israel, are not true Christians at all. And indeed, there will be no help coming from the churches.
>We frogs must sharpen our instruments, and prepare.
Mastery of oneself is a pursuit that cannot be denied to anyone. Even prisoners.
Read about the life of evangelist Billy Sunday
The time is now. In case you didn't notice. Frog Dragon Army is assembling.
We are grasping for each other feebly in the ruins of the free press and what the founding fathers tried to give their stupid, ungrateful kids.
It's party time. Quickly now, before the gate closes.
On one hand, if my work is upsetting to women, this is a positive signal my art is an effective rebellion against the Feminine Tyranny of the Sexual Dystopia we live in.
I don't think you understand my art — which is okay, not trying to be rude to you.
I don't ever like to explain the illusion, the performance, the theatricality of the magic trick that is Billionaire Psycho, because this ruins the show.
I hesitate to explain the aesthetic design principles beneath Edison Blake, to reveal the man behind the curtain.
Billionaire Psycho is a mask I write through — a nihilistic mirror image of the world we live in. His sins reflect the sins of this world. Edison Blake is a sympathetic portrayal of a villain... obviously, he's a monster, but no less monstrous than the world you and I already live in.
You are projecting female values onto a male experience.
Sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive.
The lives of women are inherently more valuable than the lives of men.
The short answer is that Edison Blake, Billionaire Psycho is the embodiment of a convergence of various disciplines (economics, psychology, and game theory).
His nihilism reflects the Social Decay we live in.
Today Western Civilization is trapped in a downward cycle, cannibalizing itself. Promiscuity has short-term benefits, long-term negative externalities.
The strategy of a playboy, womanizer reflects a ruthless approach to negative-sum economics.
In game theory, this is referred to as Defect-Defect equilibrium (choosing between Cooperate-Defect). A playboy prioritizes his sexual adventures over the damage he does to women, their future husbands, and his overall community.
But the bigger question is, why should anyone be honorable in a dishonorable world?
I'm sure you will disagree, you expect men to sacrifice for women and protect, provide for them no matter what.
I approve of these paragraphs and the spacing of the sentences, well done.
Sure, I just think patriots will refuse to fight for a system that doesn't value them.
Bad for women, bad for community, but that's what happens when Imperial Decay turns to the death of the Empire.
Damn bro this would be easier to read if you broke it into paragraphs.
This is easy to train Clt875.
The basic pattern is:
A long paragraph is 2-4 sentences.
After a long paragraph, you write a short paragraph that's only one sentence.
Then you switch between long, short, long, short.
This allows the reader's eyes to rest, by providing negative space.
Obviously, there's more complexity than that, but if you stick to these simple rules, your layout will immediately be in the top 15% of writers. It surprises me how many professionals miss the basic lessons on layout.
In comparison with your early comment (which, I appreciate any feedback, good or bad), which was a 25-line wall of text. The problem with this is that if you examine eye tracking software and cameras, you will discover that the human eye doesn't move in an exact linear pattern. The human eye darts around erratically, which is the foundation of all visual design.
So, somewhere around the 4th or 5th line, my eye (and everyone else's) gets lost.
I solve this by zooming in extremely close and then scrolling down the page, but it's just an inefficient style of presentation.
Indentation provides a reliable solution, fortunately.
Thanks, I have been training new writers along FrogTwitter for the past 2 months.
Hard for me to articulate to beginners how to change, improve, polish until I look at their work, and start writing it down and diagramming it.
Later this year I will publish a list on basic rules to follow, key patterns simplified to improve prose, but right now I'm still trying to figure out what problems most autodidact writers have.
Can't offer solutions until I know the main concerns.
Agree to disagree.