5 Comments
Apr 10Liked by Billionaire Psycho

"Each of Crichton’s novels required extensive research into ONE BIG THING. Subject after subject, his knowledge base grew. Insights accumulated. Every time he wrote a novel, he studied a different field of science, and across subsequent decades these insights contributed to his future novels, enriching their adventures with empirical data."

Interesting observation! I find a similar approach very useful with regards to philosophical concepts and my essays. The research for each essay represents a little building block you can call on again in the future.

Expand full comment

You had me laughing out loud at Galois Group!

I'll work my way through your [typically[ gigantic post over the next week and provide further remarks.

Expand full comment

Ok

Now

How do you explain in writing knowledge that you “do” meaning what you know is mainly in your hands?

Because I can’t 😂

Helpfully I can explain in person, often with say using rocks or other objects as say a sandtable model.

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Billionaire Psycho

This is great! I must put Andy Weir on my reading list, not familiar with his work. I loved Ender’s Game, my introduction to Orson Scott Card, and the other Ender books aren’t bad either. Herbert was an epic storyteller who made a grand adventure in the Dune series, although he did have a science background. Have y’all seen Solaris? Science fiction movie with George Clooney. Very psychological, not a lot of effects. I liked it… I remember reading that it’s a remake of a Russian film.

Expand full comment